IKunCode vs Apiporter
One model on two relays: integrity, speed, price, cache and availability, plus intelligence adjusted for degradation and value for money, with advice for the priority you choose.
Which to choose
Five dimensions
Further out is better. Integrity is the share of intelligence kept; the other four are places among all relays of this model.
IKunCodeApiporter
What matters most to you
For Balanced, choose Apiporter
IKunCode68
Apiporter72
Main reasons
Integrity25%
IKunCode keeps 100% of the model's intelligence; Apiporter keeps 39%
Availability20%
Apiporter was available 100.0% of the last 24 hours; IKunCode 83.3%
Value20%
Value: no data for at least one relay
Speed15%
Apiporter answers in 2.03 s, 83% faster than IKunCode at 12.04 s
Price15%
Price: no data for at least one relay
Cache5%
Cache: no data for at least one relay
Key figures
Adjusted intelligence
Higher is better
Cost per coding session
2M input + 40k output tokens · Lower is better
Value for money
Intelligence points per ¥1 · Higher is better
All figures
Intelligence
Adjusted intelligence59.123.0
Intelligence kept100%39%
Question accuracy100% (54 questions)39% (18 questions)
Cost
Value for money6.72—
Cost per coding session¥8.80—
Input price¥4—
Output price¥20—
Cache discount95%Not provided
Performance
Time to first token12.04 s2.03 s
Availability, last 24 hours83.3%100.0%
Samples1818
Route
Groupcc-kiroClaude_core
Data securityLevel 0Level 0
Adjusted intelligence = the model's published intelligence index × intelligence kept. Intelligence kept = the relay's question accuracy ÷ the highest accuracy among checked relays of the same model; under 10 questions, no adjustment. Value = adjusted intelligence ÷ cost per coding session. Gaps under a threshold count as close. Advice weighs the metrics by the chosen priority and is a guide only.