LuckyDomi vs IKunCode

One model on two relays: integrity, speed, price, cache and availability, plus intelligence adjusted for degradation and value for money, with advice for the priority you choose.

Model
grok
grok-heavy-test

Which to choose

Five dimensions

Further out is better. Integrity is the share of intelligence kept; the other four are places among all relays of this model.
IntegrityNot checkedSpeedNot checkedPriceNot checkedCacheNot checkedAvailabilityNot checked
LuckyDomiIKunCode

What matters most to you

Not enough data for this priority yet

Main reasons

Integrity25%

Integrity: no data for at least one relay

Availability20%

Availability: no data for at least one relay

Value20%

Value: no data for at least one relay

Speed15%

Speed: no data for at least one relay

Price15%

Price: no data for at least one relay

Cache5%

Cache: no data for at least one relay

LuckyDomi

Stronger
No clear gap
Weaker
No clear gap

IKunCode

Stronger
No clear gap
Weaker
No clear gap

Key figures

Adjusted intelligence

Higher is better

Cost per coding session

2M input + 40k output tokens · Lower is better

Value for money

Intelligence points per ¥1 · Higher is better

All figures

Intelligence

Adjusted intelligence31.031.0
Intelligence keptNot checkedNot checked
Question accuracyNot checkedNot checked

Cost

Value for money—24.4
Cost per coding session—¥1.27
Input price—¥0.6
Output price—¥1.8
Cache discountNot providedNot provided

Performance

Time to first token—4.13 s
Availability, last 24 hours—100.0%
Samples—18

Route

Groupgrokgrok-heavy-test
Data securityLevel 0Level 0
Adjusted intelligence = the model's published intelligence index × intelligence kept. Intelligence kept = the relay's question accuracy ÷ the highest accuracy among checked relays of the same model; under 10 questions, no adjustment. Value = adjusted intelligence ÷ cost per coding session. Gaps under a threshold count as close. Advice weighs the metrics by the chosen priority and is a guide only.