ZNB.ai vs Apiporter
One model on two relays: integrity, speed, price, cache and availability, plus intelligence adjusted for degradation and value for money, with advice for the priority you choose.
Which to choose
Five dimensions
Further out is better. Integrity is the share of intelligence kept; the other four are places among all relays of this model.
ZNB.aiApiporter
What matters most to you
For Balanced, choose Apiporter
ZNB.ai32
Apiporter72
Main reasons
Integrity25%
ZNB.ai keeps 50% of the model's intelligence; Apiporter keeps 39%
Availability20%
Apiporter was available 100.0% of the last 24 hours; ZNB.ai 75.9%
Value20%
Value: no data for at least one relay
Speed15%
Apiporter answers in 2.03 s, 91% faster than ZNB.ai at 21.85 s
Price15%
Price: no data for at least one relay
Cache5%
Cache: no data for at least one relay
Key figures
Adjusted intelligence
Higher is better
Cost per coding session
2M input + 40k output tokens · Lower is better
Value for money
Intelligence points per ¥1 · Higher is better
All figures
Intelligence
Adjusted intelligence29.623.0
Intelligence kept50%39%
Question accuracy50% (18 questions)39% (18 questions)
Cost
Value for money——
Cost per coding session——
Input price——
Output price——
Cache discountNot providedNot provided
Performance
Time to first token21.85 s2.03 s
Availability, last 24 hours75.9%100.0%
Samples2918
Route
Groupznb-cc-特惠Claude_core
Data securityLevel 0Level 0
Adjusted intelligence = the model's published intelligence index × intelligence kept. Intelligence kept = the relay's question accuracy ÷ the highest accuracy among checked relays of the same model; under 10 questions, no adjustment. Value = adjusted intelligence ÷ cost per coding session. Gaps under a threshold count as close. Advice weighs the metrics by the chosen priority and is a guide only.